Appeal No. |
Short Title (reported decision if any) |
Party represented |
Issue |
Outcome |
83-500 |
Magnavox v. Mattel |
Mattel |
Scope of means plus function claims |
Settled after oral argument |
83-935 |
Hycor v. Schlueter, 740 F.2d 1529 |
Hycor, Inc. |
Unenforceability, on sale bar, obviousness, attorney fee award |
Adverse judgment (by prior counsel) reversed as to unenforceability and attorney fees |
88-1152 |
Hemstreet v. Spiegel, Inc., 851 F.2d 348 |
Harold S. Hemstreet |
Settlement exception to “Lear” doctrine |
Favorable judgment affirmed |
87-1512
87-1569 |
Hemstreet v. Burroughs Corp., 861 F.2d 728 |
Harold S. Hemstreet |
Inequitable conduct |
Adverse judgment reversed |
90-1007 |
Serpentix v. Hydroginetics, 909 F.2d 194
|
Hydroginetics et al. |
Limits on patentee in sending notice of infringement letters |
Restraining order against patentee vacated, (favorable) judgment of One Dollar left undisturbed |
90-1436 |
Hemstreet v. Computer Entry Sys., 972 F.2d 1290 (Fed. Cir 1992) |
Harold S. Hemstreet |
Laches and estoppel |
Reversed and remanded adverse judgment with instructions |
90-1486 |
Hemstreet v. Lundy Electronics & Systems |
Harold S. Hemstreet |
Laches and estoppel |
Reversed adverse judgment and remanded adverse judgment with instructions |
91-1089 |
Hemstreet v. BancTec |
Harold S. Hemstreet |
Laches and estoppel |
Reversed adverse judgment and remanded adverse judgment with instructions |
03-1269,
03 -1286 |
Phillips v. AWH, 415 F.3d 1303 (en banc) |
Intellectual Property Law Assn. of Chicago, amicus curiae |
Patent claim construction |
Positions generally adopted by Court, including suggested basis for decision of this case (claim differentiation) |
04-1012 |
Lifetime v. GSC Technology |
GSC Technology Corp. |
Scope of design patent |
Preliminary injunction affirmed, Rule 36 |
2006-1562 |
Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 498 F.3d 1354 (en banc) |
Elite Group, Inc. and Sensio, Inc., amicus curiae |
Scope of design patent claims |
Judgement affirmed |
2007-1149 |
Halliburton Energy Servs. v. M-I LLC, 514 F.3d 1244 |
Halliburton |
Patent claim indefiniteness, claim construction |
Judgement affirmed |
2007-2577 |
In re Prazoff |
Michael Prazoff |
Obviousness, anticipation, claim construction |
Affirmed, Rule 36 |
