![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
PRESS RELEASE November 7, 2005
|
|
|
CHICAGO, IL – November 7, 2005 Cook Alex partner Edward D. Manzo joined a panel discussion on November 7th, which included two judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The panel addressed the ongoing debate in patent law over written descriptions of inventions. "Today, one studies the claims of a patent to determine its scope. However, it wasn't always that way. The first U.S. patent statute in 1793 called for a written description of the invention," said Manzo. "Only later did Congress adopt patent statutes requiring claims to distinguish the invention over prior art. The 1793 language about the written description, however, was not removed and is still reflected in patent law that addresses providing an enabling disclosure of the invention. This has caused significant problems where the courts and the USPTO have sometimes used this written descrption requirement to invalidate patent claims. This provided the backdrop to our panel discussion, which was lively and informative."
From left to right: Judge Richard Linn, Chief Judge Paul Michel, Bradford P. Lyerla, Edward D. Manzo, Meredith Martin Addy, Timothy R. Holbrook, Lisa A. Schneider, Judge Matthew F. Kennelly, Chief Judge James F. Holderman # # #
Attorney(s) Contact |
|
|
|